The Love Attitudes Scale Short Form (LAS-SF) was developed by Clyde Hendrick, Susan S. Hendrick, and Amy Dicke at Texas Tech University and published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships in 1998. It is based on the six love styles described by sociologist John Alan Lee and is one of the most widely used instruments in relationship research.
Most people show a blend of styles rather than a single pure type. Love styles are descriptive patterns, not fixed labels. They reflect how you currently tend to approach relationships and can shift over time with new experiences, personal growth, and changing circumstances.
Your information is safe and private
Your answers are processed locally in your browser. No data is collected or sent to any server. No login account or email is required and results are available instantly. This test is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a clinical assessment.
Disclaimer
This test is based on the Love Attitudes Scale Short Form (LAS-SF) and is for informational and educational purposes only. Love styles are patterns of relating, not clinical diagnoses. This tool does not constitute medical or psychological advice. If you are concerned about your relationships or wellbeing, please consider speaking with a qualified mental health professional.
The Love Attitudes Scale (LAS) was developed by Clyde Hendrick and Susan Hendrick at Texas Tech University and published in 1986. It measures six distinct love styles based on the typology proposed by Canadian sociologist John Alan Lee in his 1973 book The Colors of Love. The short form (LAS-SF) used here was developed by Hendrick, Hendrick, and Dicke in 1998 and has 24 items across six subscales. It is one of the most widely used instruments in relationship research.
You rate 24 statements on a 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) scale. There are no reverse-scored items. Your score for each subscale is the mean of its four items, ranging from 1.0 to 5.0. A higher mean means stronger endorsement of that love style. Your dominant love style is the subscale with the highest mean score. The score bands (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) shown on the results page are editorial summaries to help you read your profile. The LAS-SF does not define canonical normative cutoffs, so treat the bands as approximate guides rather than precise thresholds.
No single style is universally healthiest. Research tends to find that Eros and Agape are associated with higher relationship satisfaction, while Ludus and Mania show weaker or negative associations. Storge and Pragma tend to predict stable, enduring relationships. Most people show a mix of styles, and the balance shifts across relationships and life stages. The goal of this test is self-understanding, not scoring the right type.
Yes. Research shows love attitudes shift across relationships, age, and personal growth. Hendrick and Hendrick have documented that people tend to become less Ludus-oriented and more Pragma-oriented with age. Major life experiences, therapy, and sustained self-reflection can all influence how you approach love.
No. Love styles are not mental health diagnoses. They are patterns of how you tend to approach romantic relationships. The LAS-SF is a research-validated self-report measure that gives a snapshot of your current orientations. No love style is a disorder, and this test does not assess mental health.
The LAS-SF has good psychometric properties, with Cronbach alpha values ranging from approximately 0.68 to 0.86 across subscales in published research. Test-retest reliability over several weeks is moderate to good. Any self-report is limited by how honestly you answer and by which relationship you have in mind while completing it. Results are best read as a reflective snapshot rather than a fixed trait score.
Love styles describe your overall orientation toward love in a relationship: how you approach commitment, passion, and vulnerability. Love languages, popularized by Gary Chapman, describe how you prefer to give and receive affection. Love styles have decades of academic research behind them; love languages are a popular framework without the same empirical base. Both can be useful for self-reflection and conversation with a partner.
No. OmConscious has a strong commitment to user privacy and does not collect any personal data. All scoring happens entirely in your browser using JavaScript. Your answers are never transmitted to any server, stored in a database, or shared with any third party. No account or login is required, and results are available instantly. When you close the tab, your answers are gone.
Hendrick C, Hendrick SS. A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;50(2):392-402. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392
Hendrick C, Hendrick SS, Dicke A. The Love Attitudes Scale: Short Form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1998;15(2):147-159. doi:10.1177/0265407598152001
Lee JA. The Colors of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving. Don Mills, ON: New Press; 1973. (Original love style typology)
Hendrick C, Hendrick SS, Dicke A. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1998;15(1):137-142.