Empathy Test (IRI)

28 questions· 5 minutes· Instant results
Free Private Runs locally No sign-up

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) is a 28-item measure of dispositional empathy developed by Mark H. Davis at Eckerd College and published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 1983. With over 10,000 academic citations, it is one of the most widely used empathy instruments in psychology research.

28 Questions Rate how well each statement describes you on a 5-point scale. No right or wrong answers.
4 Subscales Perspective Taking, Empathic Concern, Fantasy, and Personal Distress.
0-112 Score Range Total score 0 to 112, with four subscale scores of 0 to 28 each.

Unlike tests that measure empathy as a single number, the IRI gives you a profile across four dimensions. Two of those dimensions, Perspective Taking and Empathic Concern, tend to correlate with better social outcomes. The other two, Fantasy and Personal Distress, capture imaginative engagement and emotional reactivity. Your profile reveals which aspects of empathy are most central to how you connect with others.

Your information is safe and private

Your answers are processed locally in your browser. No data is collected or sent to any server. No login account or email is required and results are available instantly. This test is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a clinical assessment.

Disclaimer

This test is based on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) by Mark H. Davis and is for informational and educational purposes only. The IRI measures dispositional empathy as a multidimensional trait and is not a clinical diagnostic tool. This tool does not constitute medical or psychological advice. If you have concerns about your emotional health or relationships, please consider speaking with a qualified mental health professional.

FAQs

What is the IRI?

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) is a 28-item self-report measure of dispositional empathy developed by Mark H. Davis at Eckerd College. It was first described in 1980 and formally validated in a study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 1983. With over 10,000 academic citations, it is one of the most widely used empathy instruments in psychology research.

What do the four subscales measure?

  • Perspective Taking (PT): the tendency to spontaneously adopt the psychological point of view of others in everyday situations.
  • Empathic Concern (EC): the tendency to feel sympathy and compassion for people who are suffering or in difficulty.
  • Fantasy (FS): how readily you imaginatively transpose yourself into the feelings of fictional characters in books, films, and stories.
  • Personal Distress (PD): the anxiety and discomfort you feel when witnessing others in emotional distress.

How is this test scored?

You rate 28 statements on a 5-point scale from 1 (Does not describe me well) to 5 (Describes me very well). Nine items are reverse-scored so that higher values consistently reflect more of the intended trait. Each of the four subscales is the sum of its 7 items, giving a range of 0 to 28 per subscale. The total score is the sum of all four subscales, ranging from 0 to 112. Note: The score bands shown here are editorial interpretations based on published college-student norms (Davis, 1983). The original IRI does not define categorical cutoffs, and scores should be interpreted as a continuum.

Is high Personal Distress a positive sign?

High Personal Distress is not straightforwardly positive. It means you feel strong anxiety or discomfort when you witness others in pain. At high levels, this can sometimes reduce helping behavior if the discomfort becomes so intense that self-protective responses take over. High Personal Distress combined with high Empathic Concern and high Perspective Taking tends to produce the most prosocial behavior. At very high levels, Personal Distress alone is associated with empathic burnout in caregiving roles.

Can empathy be developed?

Research suggests empathy has both stable trait components and trainable components. Perspective Taking in particular improves with deliberate practice, such as actively trying to understand another person's viewpoint before responding. Mindfulness training, therapy, and sustained exposure to diverse human experiences have all been associated with increases in empathic concern. The Fantasy subscale tends to be more stable and trait-like.

Is this test a diagnosis?

No. The IRI is a research-validated self-report measure of dispositional empathy. It does not diagnose any mental health condition. Scores reflect a pattern or tendency, not a fixed trait, and can shift over time with experience and effort.

How accurate is it?

The IRI has strong psychometric properties. Cronbach's alpha coefficients range from 0.70 to 0.78 across subscales (Davis, 1983), indicating good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability over two months ranges from 0.62 to 0.71, suggesting moderate to good stability over time. The scale has been validated across dozens of countries and translated into many languages. As with all self-reports, results depend on honest and self-aware responding.

What do my scores mean for my relationships?

Higher Perspective Taking and Empathic Concern scores tend to predict better relationship quality, more prosocial behavior, and greater satisfaction in close relationships. High Personal Distress can contribute to empathic burnout if not balanced with self-care strategies. Fantasy scores have a weaker link to real-world social outcomes and a stronger connection to imaginative and creative engagement with stories and art.

Is my data stored anywhere?

No. OmConscious has a strong commitment to user privacy and does not collect any personal data. All scoring happens entirely in your browser using JavaScript. Your answers are never transmitted to any server, stored in a database, or shared with any third party. No account or login is required, and results are available instantly. When you close the tab, your answers are gone.

REFERENCES

Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980;10:85.

Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(1):113-126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Chopik WJ, O'Brien E, Konrath SH. Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017;48(1):23-38. doi:10.1177/0022022116673910

Davis MH. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980;10:85. Davis MH. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(1):113-126.